CFO Network: Exploring sustainable business transformations and transitions

Published

28 June, 2023

Type

WBCSD insights

Share:

Authors

Sok Hui Chng, Group CFO, DBS, Pepijn Rijvers, EVP, WBCSD

What are the key takeaways from this CFO-led event?

A changing investor landscape

CFOs see a significant evolution of investor expectations and a growing recognition of sustainability considerations in their investment decision-making:

  • Investment performance expectations: Just as several participants echoed that it is possible to “Make money in sustainability”, investors also have a better understanding of the value in balancing short-term financial performance and long-term sustainability impact.
  • Increased focus on ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) integration: Investors recognize that ESG considerations can impact a company’s long-term financial performance and expect companies to integrate ESG factors into their business strategies.
  • Credibility and transparency: Investors place greater emphasis on standardized ESG metrics and reporting. They want transparent, consistent and comparable data to assess the sustainability performance of companies. They also want companies to have a credible transition plan to address ESG risks, demonstrate good governance practices and identify opportunities for long-term growth and business viability.

CFO-led business transformation: challenges and opportunities

Current investor trends reflect a shift in mindsets and an orientation towards the long-term view, bringing a new set of challenges for companies to align with ESG integration and performance. CFOs highlighted three key challenges and opportunities they face today:

Challenge: Measurement and reporting frameworks

Participants all agree and recognise that companies face the ongoing challenge of measurement and reporting due the lack of simple, standardised, practical frameworks and metrics. New ESG reporting standards call for clear guidance on ESG acronyms and forums to guide businesses.

Opportunity: Defining metrics by sector

While the ESG reporting landscape is dynamic and continually evolving, businesses should strive to identify and select a few key metrics most relevant for their sector. For example, companies in the same industry could come together and agree to a set of simple, standard, comparable metrics. This would also benefit financial institutions in their assessment of customer’s projects and transition plans.

Challenge: Regional diversity and variability in economic structure

As a region, Asia has significant diversity and variability in terms of economic structures and starting points for a just transition. Balancing the need for energy access, affordability, and reliability with decarbonization efforts poses a complex problem for a growing region of more than 3 billion people.

Opportunity: Conducting a materiality assessment for long-term corporate value

Companies should conduct a materiality assessment to identify sustainability risks and opportunities most relevant to their business and to the climate transition agenda. Understanding material ESG risks can bring incentives such as improved risk management and long-term resiliency of the business, increased access to capital, and potential cost savings. By focusing on what is material, companies can focus on new market growth through innovation, reap the rewards of ‘first mover advantage’ and allocate resources to investments for long-term corporate value.

Challenge: Lack of standardized pricing for carbone

Unlike traditional financial and accounting metrics, there is no clear and standardised pricing mechanism for carbon. Companies are facing the challenge of measuring the financial impact of carbon on their business due to the lack of a single, standard price on carbon.

Opportunity: Setting and assessing internal carbon pricing 

Companies could set an internal carbon pricing and perform stress testing and sensitivity analysis to evaluate the resilience of their business models and financial performance under different carbon pricing scenarios. By incorporating an internal carbon pricing into their valuation, companies can demonstrate credibility and commitment in how they have assessed material risks and opportunities, and that they have a long-term view to building a climate resilient and sustainable business.   

What’s next?

There was clarity in the roundtable discussion that the voice of the CFO has agency in supporting sustainable business transformation. Showing up actively and contributing brings value with a high return on investment towards essential system change for a better future. There is also a clear need for ecosystem play across government, regulators, private and financial sectors to make this possible.


Skip to content